Resources

Everything you need to evaluate autonomy.

Practical guides written for plant directors, yield engineers and quality managers — not for a marketing funnel.

Guides

Start here.

Guide

Designing a protein autonomy pilot

Choosing the wedge line, defining the success metric, setting the gates and structuring the exit terms.

14 min read

Guide

Yield measurement without self-deception

Baselines, carcass-mix matching, reconciliation windows and statistical significance.

9 min read

Guide

Building the food-safety case for autonomy

How to bring quality and HACCP owners along, and what evidence they will require.

11 min read

Guide

Preparing OT networks for plant-edge AI

Segmentation, identity, stop-path independence and change control for IT/OT teams.

12 min read

Guide

The giveaway reduction playbook

From weight prediction to batch composition to closed-loop checkweigher control.

10 min read

Guide

Labour resilience through autonomy

Modelling output stability against vacancy rates on the cut floor.

8 min read

Resource types

Formats for every stage.

Guides & playbooks

Long-form, practical documents you can hand to a colleague who was not in the meeting.

Benchmarks

Measured results and methodology from design-partner lines, with baselines stated. [PLACEHOLDER]

Webinars

Recorded sessions with plant directors, yield engineers and quality managers.

Security & validation pack

Architecture, controls, validation protocols and evidence formats for your auditors.

ROI models

Yield, giveaway, labour and safety models built with your own line data.

Webinars

Recorded sessions.

Webinar

Foreign material: detection versus prevention

Quality leaders from three processors on resolving the escape-versus-false-reject trade-off.

42 min

Webinar

Inside a nine-week deboning pilot

A blow-by-blow account of shadow baselining through to supervised autonomy.

38 min

Webinar

Autonomy and the HACCP plan

Where autonomous decisions sit in a control plan, and what evidence auditors expect.

45 min

Benchmarks

Design-partner cohort results.

4.1% Average saleable-yield uplift on pilot deboning lines [PLACEHOLDER]
61% Reduction in weight giveaway per fixed-weight pack
38 ms Median foreign-material reject decision at the plant edge
99.9% Plant-edge runtime uptime target with fail-safe line stop
Featured resource

The pilot design guide.

How to run an evaluation that produces an answer

Most automation pilots end ambiguously because the metric, the baseline and the exit terms were never agreed. This guide gives you the structure we use with every design partner — including the parts that let you walk away cleanly.

  • Selecting the wedge line and workflow
  • Defining a metric your finance team accepts
  • Shadow baselining and significance thresholds
  • Gate criteria and exit terms in writing
autonomy on
By role

What to read for your job.

Plant director

The business case

ROI modelling, payback, labour resilience and how to structure a pilot that gives you a defensible answer.

  • Pilot design guide
  • Labour resilience playbook
  • ROI model template
  • Customer references
Yield engineer

The technical detail

Cut planning, twin validation, program rollout and yield measurement methodology.

  • Yield measurement guide
  • Giveaway reduction playbook
  • Agent API reference
  • Twin validation docs
Quality manager

The food-safety case

Evidence design, HACCP alignment, model change control and audit-ready exports.

  • Food-safety case guide
  • HACCP webinar
  • Validation pack
  • Audit schema reference
IT / OT

The deployment detail

Network segmentation, identity, edge architecture, stop-path independence and change control.

  • OT network guide
  • Security pack
  • Edge deployment docs
  • OTA and rollback reference
Trust centre

Documentation for your reviewers.

SOC 2 Type II (in progress)HACCP-alignedUSDA-FSISEU 853/2004GDPRISO 27001 (planned)

Per-tenant isolation

Every plant gets isolated data, models and vector stores. Cut recipes and species models never cross a tenant boundary — federated learning shares patterns, never your product IP.

Assurance-grade audit trail

Immutable logs link sensor frames, model version, autonomy level, approvals, overrides and outcomes for every agent action — built for recall defence and model governance.

Fail-safe by design

Blade, robot and line stops are deterministic and independent of the cloud. Graceful degradation returns the cell to a safe state if perception confidence drops.

Read our security overview

Reference architectures

By line type.

Cutting & deboning

  • Robotic primal cutting cells
  • Deboning and trimming lines
  • Blade force and seam controllers
  • Cell safety and E-stop interlocks

Grading & inspection

  • Vision and hyperspectral graders
  • Carcass grading cameras
  • X-ray and metal detectors
  • Checkweighers and rejectors

Portioning & packing

  • Portioners and slicers
  • Fixed-weight batching
  • Packing and palletising robots
  • Labelling and traceability

See the integration reference

Feedback

From readers.

“The line does not care that every bird is different — Slicium does. We stopped programming a machine and started supervising an operator that adapts to each carcass.”
Marta EllisonPlant Director, Northfold Poultry
“Giveaway was the quiet leak nobody could close. Watching the portioner hold target within a couple of grams, shift after shift, changed the economics of the whole pack line.”
Devan RossProcessing & Yield Engineer, Meridian Pork
“What sold my team was the audit trail. Every reject links back to the frame, the model version and who approved the autonomy level. That is what a recall investigation actually needs.”
Priya RaghavanFood Safety & Quality Manager, Cascadia Protein

Design-partner quotes are composite and pending publication approval. [PLACEHOLDER]

Resource FAQ

About these materials.

Guides and technical references are open. The security and validation pack and customer references require a short conversation, because they contain customer-specific material we are contractually obliged to protect.

Results are reconciled against each customer’s own MES and finance systems rather than our telemetry. Where a figure is provisional or from a small cohort, it is marked as such. [PLACEHOLDER]

A typical pilot runs one line for 8–12 weeks: two weeks of integration and shadow-mode baselining, four to six weeks of advisory operation, then graduated autonomy against the agreed success metric. Connectors for common cutting, grading, X-ray, portioning and MES systems are pre-built. [PLACEHOLDER]

Three tiers: Line at $12,000 per processing line per month for one workflow, Plant at $80,000 per month for the whole loop including the twin, and Enterprise custom agreements for multi-site fleets. Annual prepay saves 15–20%, and outcome-based components can be tied to yield, giveaway, labour or safety.

Want the security and validation pack?

Architecture, controls, validation protocols and evidence formats — sent after a short call with your reviewers.